Coalition Asks EPA to Regulate Greenhouse Gases and Other Toxic Air Pollutants from Industrial Animal Operations
WASHINGTON (Sept. 21, 2009) – The Humane
Society of the United States and a coalition of
environmental and public health organizations
filed a legal petition with the Environmental
Protection Agency seeking to regulate air
pollution from factory farms.
The petitioners joining The HSUS
include Association of Irritated Residents;
Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment;
Clean Air Task Force; Dairy Education Alliance;
El Comité para el Bienestar de Earlimart;
Environmental Integrity Project; Friends of the
Earth; and Waterkeeper
Alliance.
“Unregulated air pollution
from massive factory farms has a devastating
impact on human health and the environment,”
says Jonathan Lovvorn, vice president and chief
counsel for Animal Protection Litigation and
Research at The HSUS. “The EPA should hold
these big agribusiness corporations accountable
for the enormous harm they are inflicting on
local communities, independent family farmers,
and the environment.”
The 69-page
petition provides detailed scientific and legal
information about the significant emissions of
methane and nitrous oxide—two greenhouse
gases—as well as hydrogen sulfide and ammonia
from factory farms, and how all of these
pollutants have been shown to have negative
effects on human health and welfare, including
adverse effects on climate and the environment
in the United States.
The petition
further explains how reducing emissions of
major pollutants from concentrated animal
feeding operations (CAFOs), which are massive
industrial facilities confining thousands or
even millions of animals in warehouse-like
conditions, will improve human health, reduce
suffering of farm animals, protect habitat for
wildlife, and reduce the effects of climate
change and other environmental problems.
Regulating air pollution from CAFOs will also
create a strong incentive for new CAFOs to
employ production methods that reduce
emissions.
The Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has
deemed the livestock sector “one of the top two
or three most significant contributors to the
most serious environmental problems, at every
scale from local to global.” This same
report found that animal agriculture was
responsible for contributing 18 percent of all
greenhouse gas emissions—more than even the
transport sector.
In the United
States, confined farm animals produce 500
million tons of waste every year, more than 3.3
times the amount of waste created by humans.
Nevertheless, the EPA does not currently
require these animal factories to meet any
testing, performance or emission standards
under the Clean Air Act.
CAFOs
economically harm small family farms engaging
in practices that are better for animal welfare
and more environmentally sustainable. These
independent farmers cannot financially compete
with large factory farms, which cut corners and
jeopardize environmental and public health.
Forcing factory farms to comply with
environmental and health standards would level
the playing field and help small farmers become
more competitive.
“Our lungs and the
future of our planet are not animal factory
subsidies,” said Tom Fratz, president of the
Association of Irritated Residents and a
resident of the San Joaquin Valley, an air
basin in California with more than 2.6 million
dairy cows. “President Obama promised us during
the election that he would protect rural
residents from this pollution and we expect EPA
to keep that promise.”
“Hog lots and
other factory farms aren’t just stinky, they’re
also destabilizing our climate,” said Kate
McMahon of Friends of the Earth. “The EPA has a
legal obligation to protect the public by
cracking down on this economic and public
health threat – a threat that has yet to be
addressed by climate legislation pending in
Congress.”
“The people who live in the
communities devastated by unregulated air
pollution from animal factories deserve
protection” said Charlie Tebbutt of the Western
Environmental Law Center and co-chair of the
Dairy Education Alliance. “Implementing this
petition will get animal factories into the
Clean Air Act process and give communities
better opportunities to protect
themselves.”
“Through global warming and
deposition, the toxic emissions from industrial
animal operations have profoundly impacted our
water resources” said Hannah Connor of
Waterkeeper Alliance. “By actively regulating
the emissions from this industry, EPA will be
taking a positive step towards protecting and
enhancing not only the quality of our Nation’s
air resources, but also the quality of our
Nation’s water resources, and the public health
and welfare of our communities.”
FACTS:
·
Over the last several decades, increasing
numbers of animals are being warehoused in
fewer, but larger, operations, in which many of
them are intensively confined in small spaces
such as battery cages, veal crates and
gestation crates.
·
The increased waste and emissions associated
with factory farming result in air pollution
that contributes to climate change, causes
serious public health concerns, and harms the
environment.
·
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations (FAO) deemed the animal
agriculture sector “one of the top two or three
most significant contributors to the most
serious environmental problems, at every scale
from local to global.” This same report,
Livestock’s Long Shadow, found that global
meat, egg and milk production generate more
greenhouse gas emissions than even the
transport sector.
·
Pollution from farm animal production is only
continuing to increase, making emissions from
CAFOs some of the nation’s largest sources of
pollution.
·
Despite clear evidence that CAFOs significantly
contribute to emissions of methane, nitrous
oxide, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, volatile
organic compounds, and particulate matter, the
EPA does not require CAFOs to meet any testing,
performance or emission standards under the
Clean Air Act.
·
Numerous scientific surveys, including the U.S.
Inventory Report adopted by the EPA, establish
that CAFOs meet the standards for regulation
under section 111 of the Clean Air Act as a
source that causes or contributes significantly
to air pollution which endangers public health
and welfare.