Protecting Against Polluted Runoff
ARYLAND WATERKEEPERS SETTLE LAWSUIT AGAINST
DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT ENSURING BETTER
PROTECTION FOR THE BAY FROM CONSTRUCTION SITES
Contact:
Drew Koslow, Choptank
Riverkeeper, 410.533.2753
Eliza Steinmeier,
Baltimore Harbor Waterkeeper, 410.736.8844
Michele Merkel, Waterkeeper Alliance,
202.257.0877
Jane F. Barrett, University of
Maryland Environmental Law Clinic, 410.706.8074
(Baltimore MD) – Twelve Maryland
Waterkeeper organizations and the Waterkeeper
Alliance, represented by the University of
Maryland Environmental Law Clinic, have reached
an agreement with the Maryland Department of
the Environment (“MDE”) resolving the
Waterkeepers' legal challenge to MDE's general
stormwater permit for construction sites. As a
result of this agreement, MDE has committed to
making significant changes to the way it
requires developers to prevent polluted runoff
caused when rain washes sediment and other
pollutants from these exposed areas.
Construction activities and land
development contribute an estimated 80 million
tons of sediment to the Nation’s waterways each
year. When construction contractors do not
adequately control runoff, commonly called
stormwater, rainfall carries heavy loads of
sediment into local tributaries or storm
sewers. The Chesapeake Bay is choking on
sediment and other pollutants that come from
construction sites. More than 90 of Maryland’s
streams and rivers have been officially
designated as “impaired” by excessive sediment.
In fact, MDE has identified runoff from urban
areas, including construction sites, as the
largest source of nutrient pollution in the
lower western shore of Maryland. Population
trends will compound the problems created by
stormwater runoff from construction sites as
more than a million more people are expected to
move to the Bay watershed during this decade
alone. This growth will result in additional
stress to the watershed through increased
development. Researchers expect that the amount
of land converted from farms and forest to
residential and commercial developments will
increase more than 60% by 2030. Maryland had at
least 2000 building permits per square mile
from 1990-2004, significantly more than most
other states in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
Choptank Riverkeeper Drew Koslow, who
served as an expert witness in the litigation,
has seen these impacts first hand:
“Sediment-laden runoff from construction sites
can drastically alter the ability of a stream
to support life. This mud prevents sunlight
from reaching diminishing submerged aquatic
grasses, smothers oyster reefs and severely
stresses fish.”
Today's settlement
requires MDE to update the state's erosion and
sediment control standards no later than May
2010. These standards specify measures that
must be taken on construction sites to prevent
water pollution. The standards, more than 15
years old, are outdated and provide inadequate
protection for the Bay and its tributaries. MDE
has committed to incorporate provisions that
emphasize up-to-date measures to prevent
erosion and sediment-laden runoff from the
exposed soils of construction sites. MDE has
also committed to incorporating into its
General Permit any specific effluent limits
issued by the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), applicable to construction stormwater.
The agreement requires MDE to set procedures
that ensure expanded opportunities for the
public to review and comment upon stormwater
planning documents for construction sites.
Finally, the agreement provides for improved
protection of waterbodies already over-burdened
by sediment by requiring large construction
sites in these specific waterbodies to apply
for individual permits. In describing the
settlement, Jane F. Barrett, director of the
University of Maryland Environmental Law
Clinic, a service of the University of Maryland
School of Law in Baltimore, stated, “Strong,
clear and enforceable permits are critical to
any effort to preserve the Chesapeake Bay and
its tributaries because permits are the
building blocks of the Clean Water Act. This
agreement is an important step in the right
direction.”
Taken together, MDE's
commitments to improve its construction
stormwater permitting program will result in
real, measureable improvements in water quality
throughout the state. Better steps to control
runoff from construction will help the State
meet its commitments to reduce pollution to the
Bay.
Baltimore Harbor Waterkeeper Eliza
Smith Steinmeier expects to see real benefits
from this agreement: “Dirt is literally choking
our waterways. In addition, dirt from
construction sites carries with it other
pollution such as nutrients and chemicals. This
agreement ensures improvements in construction
practices that will directly result in improved
water quality in our streams and rivers.”
The Maryland Waterkeepers -- Anacostia
Riverkeeper, Assateague Coastkeeper, Baltimore
Harbor Waterkeeper, Chester Riverkeeper,
Choptank Riverkeeper, Lower Susquehanna
Riverkeeper, Patuxent Riverkeeper, Potomac
Riverkeeper, Sassafras Riverkeeper, Severn
Riverkeeper, South Riverkeeper, West/Rhode
Riverkeeper -- applaud MDE's commitment to
protecting the Chesapeake Bay and all of the
state's watersheds from construction site
runoff. The department's focus on this
significant water quality issue demonstrates
the focused vision that is necessary if our
waters and communities are to benefit from new,
effective approaches to pollution control.